Opinion 2/2019 on the draft list of the competent supervisory authority of Norway regarding the processing operations subject to the requirement of a data protection impact assessment (Article 35.4 GDPR)

23 January 2019

Opinion 2/2019 on the draft list of the competent supervisory authority of Norway regarding the processing operations subject to the requirement of a data protection impact assessment (Article 35.4 GDPR) 648.2KB

Μεταφόρτωση

EDPB
Norway

Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA)

Report on Article 36 alerts of Schengen Information System decision

21 October 2024

CSC Documents

The members of the Schengen Information System II Supervision Coordination Group (SIS II SCG) and the Coordinated Supervision Committee (CSC) conducted a coordinated inspection activity concerning the Schengen Information System (SIS). The SIS is the most widely used and largest information sharing system for security and border management in Europe.

Within the scope of the inspections, the alerts and procedures with regard to Article 36 of the SIS II Decision were checked, as there has been a Europe-wide increase in the number of alerts in this alert category. In order to achieve comparable results, a questionnaire was developed by the SIS SCG and used by the Member States for their inspections.

The results indicated various differences between the nineteen Member States which took part in the coordinated inspection activity, enabling the CSC to draw conclusions and to recommend the necessary measures with regard to the documentation of the alerts, their quality, the time limits and retention period, as well as substantive and technical issues.

Guidelines 2/2023 on Technical Scope of Art. 5(3) of ePrivacy Directive

16 October 2024

Guidelines

Letter to Kosovan DPA from the Chair of EDPB

10 October 2024

Letters

Statement 4/2024 on the recent legislative developments on the Draft Regulation laying down additional procedural rules for the enforcement of the GDPR

9 October 2024

Statements

Opinion 22/2024 on certain obligations following from the reliance on processor(s) and sub-processor(s)

9 October 2024

Opinion of the Board (Art. 64)